Reducing Fraudulent Leads to Ease the Burden on Inside Sales and Improve Working Conditions

After implementing P-MAX Fraud Detection, IBJ eliminated double-digit weekly fraudulent leads and prevented hundreds of thousands of yen in monthly ad fraud losses, freeing their sales team for meaningful work.

Industry
Company Url
Region
Spider AF Product
Reduced fraudulent conversions
Reduced fraudulent conversions
ROAS improvement
14 days Time to first insight
The Challenge

Budget disappearing with nothing to show for it

MOTA's performance team noticed their cost-per-install was rising sharply — but installs weren't converting to active users. Something was eating their budget.

  • Google Ads campaigns showing high install volume with near-zero in-app activity
  • Meta click-through rates inflated by what appeared to be bot traffic
  • Internal attribution data was inconsistent — impossible to identify the source
  • Monthly ad spend growing without corresponding business results
  • Manual IP blocking too slow and too narrow to make a meaningful impact
Why Spider AF

The only platform built specifically for ad fraud detection

MOTA needed more than a generic analytics tool. They needed a system that understood how click fraud works in performance marketing — and could stop it in real time.

01

Real-time invalid traffic detection

Spider AF monitors every click and impression in real time, flagging bot traffic, click farms, and abnormal patterns the moment they appear — before they drain more budget.

02

Direct Google & Meta integration

Native integrations with both platforms allow Spider AF to feed exclusion lists back automatically — no manual uploads, no lag between detection and action.

03

Transparent fraud reporting

Detailed dashboards give MOTA's team clear evidence of exactly what was fraudulent, how much it cost, and proof of savings — making it easy to justify the ROI internally.

The Approach

From blind spots to full visibility in four steps

01

Connect & audit

MOTA connected their Google Ads and Meta accounts to Spider AF in under 30 minutes. Spider AF immediately began pulling historical click data to establish a baseline — surfacing patterns that had gone unnoticed for months.

02

Identify fraud sources

The platform identified three distinct fraud vectors: click farms targeting their branded keywords on Google, bot-generated clicks on Meta video ads, and a network of spoofed apps generating fraudulent impressions.

03

Deploy exclusion rules

Spider AF automatically pushed IP exclusion lists and audience exclusions to both platforms. Rules were updated daily, keeping pace with evolving fraud patterns without requiring manual intervention from the MOTA team.

04

Monitor & optimise

With clean traffic data flowing in for the first time, MOTA's team could make genuine optimisation decisions. Bid strategies, audience targeting, and creative allocation all improved — because the underlying data was finally trustworthy.

The Results

Campaign performance before & after Spider AF

Valid installs rose while overall spend held steady — a direct result of eliminating fraudulent traffic from the media mix.

Monthly cost-per-install trend (JPY)

Before Spider AF After Spider AF
¥3,000 ¥2,000 ¥1,000 ¥0 Spider AF deployed Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Pre-deployment average: ¥2,840 / install Post-deployment average: ¥940 / install

"We knew something was wrong, but we had no way to prove it. Spider AF gave us the evidence we needed — and then fixed the problem automatically."

Takeshi Yamamoto
Head of Performance Marketing, MOTA
The Outcome

Clean data. Real results. Confidence restored.

Six months after deployment, MOTA's performance marketing operates on a foundation of trusted data — and their results speak for themselves.

With invalid traffic eliminated, MOTA reallocated ¥2.4 million in previously wasted budget to high-performing placements, tripled their ROAS on Google Ads, and built the internal case to double their digital ad investment in the following fiscal year.

Frequently Asked

Questions about Spider AF for performance marketing

Spider AF begins flagging suspicious patterns within hours of connecting your ad accounts. Most customers see their first actionable fraud report within 24–48 hours, and automated exclusion rules take effect immediately once confirmed.

Yes. Spider AF has native integrations with Google Ads, Meta Ads, and many other major ad platforms. Exclusion lists and audience blocks can be pushed to all connected platforms simultaneously from a single dashboard.

Yes — and that's the point. Raw numbers will decrease, but your real metrics (genuine installs, conversions, ROAS) will improve because your budget is now reaching actual humans. Spider AF's reporting helps you explain this shift to stakeholders clearly.

Absolutely. Spider AF is particularly effective for app install campaigns, where fraudulent traffic patterns (such as install farms and click injections) are most prevalent. The platform includes dedicated detection models tuned for mobile app marketing.

There's no hard minimum, but customers typically see the strongest ROI when spending ¥500,000 or more per month on digital advertising. Even at lower budgets, the data-quality improvements can meaningfully change optimisation decisions.

Is click fraud eating your ad budget right now?

Most companies don't know how much they're losing until they measure it. Spider AF shows you exactly where your budget is going — and stops the waste automatically.

✓ No credit card required ✓ Setup in 30 min ✓ Cancel anytime

Reducing Fraudulent Leads to Ease the Burden on Inside Sales and Improve Working Conditions

After implementing P-MAX Fraud Detection, IBJ eliminated double-digit weekly fraudulent leads and prevented hundreds of thousands of yen in monthly ad fraud losses, freeing their sales team for meaningful work.

Reducing Fraudulent Leads to Ease the Burden on Inside Sales and Improve Working Conditions

— Firstly, could you tell us about your area of responsibility?

Currently, I am responsible for recruiting franchisees for the 'IBJ Federation' marriage counseling agencies operated by IBJ. Our recruitment advertisements are similar to franchise advertising, where the main conversion points (CV) are requests for free informational materials or applications for briefing sessions. After receiving an application, we follow up with potential franchisees via phone or email, provide them with a detailed explanation of our services, and guide them toward joining our network.

— What led you to identify this issue?

At a certain point, our Google Ads P-MAX campaigns started displaying ads on foreign-language and MFA (Made-for-Advertising) sites. It was difficult to pinpoint the exact cause—whether it was due to the rapid increase in MFA sites, changes in Google's algorithm, or the effects of machine learning on CV optimization. We faced limitations in controlling this through offline CV integration or placement exclusions, and to be honest, we were struggling.

We allocate about 60% of our total ad budget to Google Ads and Meta Ads, with P-MAX accounting for around 25% of our Google Ads budget. Since we were investing a significant amount, fraudulent and invalid leads caused various issues.

For instance, our cost per order (CPO) began to worsen, and at one point, we considered completely halting P-MAX. However, while narrowing our options would have increased efficiency, it would have also led to missed opportunities, making the decision difficult.

Improving Efficiency for the Sake of Employees, Not Just Profit

— What made you decide to implement the P-MAX Fraud Detection Service?

Before implementing the P-MAX Fraud Detection Service, there were weeks where we encountered double-digit numbers of fraudulent and invalid leads.

When following up on applications, oftentimes the phone number and email address were incorrect, making it impossible to contact them. In some cases, the registered contact information belonged to someone completely different, leading to awkward interactions. Additionally, though our service targets Japanese-speakers,  we were receiving applications from individuals who did not understand the language. These issues significantly increased the burden and stress on our internal sales team.

This problem isn’t unique to Google—it's a common issue across all digital advertising platforms. Since digital ad platforms adjust based on the data of converted users, machine learning can sometimes create a negative feedback loop. Even if there’s a potentially effective channel, if it gets optimized for invalid leads, it becomes counterproductive.

Given this background, we decided to implement Spider AF’s P-MAX Fraud Detection Service.

— How has your experience been since implementing the P-MAX Fraud Detection Service?

After implementation, the number of fraudulent and invalid leads from P-MAX significantly decreased, reducing the burden on our internal sales team. Financially, this helped prevent hundreds of thousands of yen in ad fraud losses per month. However, more than the cost savings, we found it invaluable that our staff could focus on meaningful work.

Had we only focused on monetary savings, we might not have proceeded with the implementation. The real benefit is reducing futile tasks and interactions, allowing our team to spend time on constructive, fulfilling work. Our decision was made with both efficiency and employee well-being in mind.

For companies like ours that deal with services that are not entirely web-based, ad misplacement can take away valuable time from sales teams. I imagine other companies face similar challenges. If a company is running machine learning-based automated ad campaigns and has experienced this issue, I highly recommend implementing a solution like P-MAX Fraud Detection.

Expecting Spider AF to Address All Forms of Fraud

— What do you expect from Spider AF in the future?

We are highly satisfied with Spider AF’s current functionality. Moving forward, we hope it expands its capabilities to detect and prevent fraudulent conversions before they even occur.

Ad fraud and MFA sites can be created by anyone who wants to. Currently, no laws exist to directly crack down on ad fraud, and ad platforms themselves lack the incentive to enforce strict measures, because fraudulent activity contributes to their revenue. As advertisers, we not only suffer financial losses but also face numerous operational challenges due to degraded machine learning models, making this issue a serious concern.

We would love to see Spider AF evolve into a tool that can detect and prevent fraudulent online activity, helping ads reach the right audience as they should.

— Thank you for your time. We appreciate your insights.

In Conclusion:

As mentioned in IBJ’s interview, ad fraud is not just a numerical issue—it also burdens internal teams. While advertising operations are often considered purely digital, real-world problems frequently arise. Thanks to Spider AF’s extensive experience in analyzing one of Japan’s largest ad data sets, we offer unique solutions to these challenges.

Take advantage of our free diagnostic service for up to one month! Click the link below to try it out:
https://spideraf.com/fake-lead-protection-sign-up